There has been some news this week in the insular world of
Queensland politics; some new developments emerging as the new LNP government
takes the reigns. Campbell Newman, as part of his first press conference as
Premier of Queensland, has announced changes to six of his major state
departments.
On Monday, in Premier Newman’s first press conference as our
state’s leader, he announced the reshuffle of numerous state departments. For
the most part, this was the standard reshuffle, replacing the old
Labour-sympathetic government heads-of-department with new, LNP-aligned
ministers.
One of these changes, however, has piqued the interest of
some observers. Announced on Monday, as part of Campbell Newman’s “mandate for
change”, was the institution of Andrew Chesterman as the new Director-General
of the Department of Environment and Resource Management.
On its own, this is unremarkable news. In his statement, however,
Premier Newman also announced the plan to dismantle the Department of
Environment and Resource Management and reassign some of the major duties of
the department in order to expedite environmental impact studies and their
impact on mining applications.
"DERM (Department of Environment, Resource Management) could
be split up, but we would create a department with a stronger focus on
environment." Mr Newman said. "Changes would also be made to DEEDI
(Department of Environment, Economic Development and Innovation) to create a
mining and energy department.”
Elaborating upon this news, regarding both departments, Mr Newman
added, "It would promote mining and exploration in Queensland… It should
not take seven years to decide environmental outcomes."
This comes as unwelcome news to many Queensland residents who have
taken this move as a sign of further environmental upheaval. The government’s
installation of Andrew Chesterman would appear, on the surface, to be an
acknowledgement of the importance of sustainable environmental practices, as Mr
Chesterman’s previous roles included the position of Divisional Manager for
City Planning and Sustainability and serving as a member of the Executive
Management Team for Mr Newman’s Brisbane City Council cabinet. He holds a Bachelor
of Applied Science (Environmental Assessment and Land Use Policy) and his roles
within the BCC have both involved environmental assessments and planning the
responsible use of land.
However, there is still some dispute as to whether Mr Chesterman
can effectively protect the environment in light of the LNP’s “mandate for
change” and the veracity with which they are approaching the mining issue.
There has been, and will likely continue to be, dispute about the government’s
priorities where environmental protection is concerned. Added to this is the
knowledge that, despite his impressive credentials, Mr Chesterman was part of
the committee that approved the massive construction projects around Queensland
and allowed some of our city’s waterways and low-lying areas to become little
more than filthy water traps and punji pits. It remains to be seen how Mr
Chesterman handles DERM in his first weeks, and, indeed, how he’ll handle the
disbanding and reappropriation of the department and its duties.
"We do have a mandate for change, a mandate for the policies
we put out there prior to the election," said Mr Newman on Monday.
This stance on public works and civil planning has the potential
to create some amazing reforms regarding the provision of infrastructure and
the expansion of mining business in central Queensland. Unfortunately, the same
elements of this story that could provide so much benefit to so many people have
the potential to turn large parts of the state into ecologically unsound
disaster zones. While it may not prove to be such a bad idea to separate the
department’s duties to aid in timely and appropriate responses to mining
applications and environmental impact studies, there is also a chance that
de-regulation of mining in Queensland could open the proverbial flood gates and
allow mining corporations to turn large parts of the state into flaming pits
from Hell; or large-scale portals into the horrifying depths of Mordor. And
with such an overwhelming government majority, there would ultimately be very
little anyone on the outside could do to prevent it.
So, with that said, I’m personally curious to see how long it
takes before public opinion swings towards the feeling of Buyer’s Remorse. I
give it a month.
For further information on the latest departmental reshuffle, a statement
released by the Liberal National Party government can be found here.
Karl Anderson
Hi Karl, I thought your views were insightful. I am a part-time voluntary environmental activist and I dislike party politics and hierarchy. I was appalled when I read Campbell Newman's comments in the media prior to his election discussing his thoughts on DERM and how he believed they had been infiltrated by 'extremist greenies' or some such twaddle.
ReplyDeleteRead more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/bureaucrats-drunk-on-power-newman-20120216-1tahl.html#ixzz1rQB8HY20
I was also horrified to read of his plan to dissect DERM if he won office. Anyway, based on his comments I would expect Mr Andrew Chesterman, won't have any 'green leanings', despite his environment studies from years ago. I looked at his resume, and he has been the penultimate BCC Corporate Executive. In my experience this usually means allegiance to the company bosses concerned and taking your place in the hierarchy. In my opinion, the natural environment in Qld could be placed in severe jeopardy unless Queenslanders who care, start voicing their views about environmental protection. A change in Qld politicians shouldn't mean open season on the natural environment, I don't remember Campbell Newman running that campaign.
I'm not expecting great things from this government. There's a lot that can go wrong and they've already begun making their priorities clear. This is going to be an interesting few years...
Delete